Draft page - not yet linked from main navigation or sitemap.

Our position

Pick one platform and commit for at least three years before considering a migration. Running VEX and LEGO side-by-side in the same classroom doubles the parts-management burden, splits the teacher expertise, and doubles the software-license and curriculum-subscription footprint.

The exception: a district with separate middle schools on different platforms, or an elementary on LEGO and middle on VEX with an intentional progression. Those are strategic choices, not accidental ones.

Other voices

Reputable sources worth reading before you decide. Labels reflect our honest read of each source's general stance, not direct quotes.

Both vendors publish complete K-12 curricula assuming their own platform. Running both means maintaining two full curriculum tracks.

Why trust it: Manufacturer design. The curricula are complete for one platform, not designed to blend.

Some large districts run both platforms at different schools or different grade bands. This works when it is a deliberate structure; it breaks when individual teachers try to blend them in one classroom.

Why trust it: Real district experience. The distinction is scale and intentionality.

A few veteran teachers run both platforms well. They are also the teachers who have been doing this for 15+ years and have no day job other than robotics. It is not a transferable model.

Why trust it: Real teacher experience, narrow applicability.
A note on honesty: We have no affiliate arrangement with any brand or publication linked here. Labels reflect our honest read of each source's general stance as of this writing; they are not quotes. Click through and form your own view.